LEGAL INTELLIGENCE FOR EVERYONE

The law belongs to everyone.
You’d never know it.
Until now.

Mockingbird brings proactive litigation intelligence to people who could never afford it and firms that can’t scale without it. It watches the record, investigates what changed, and prepares the next move before you ask.

The Night Shift

Opposing counsel files at 11:47 PM.
By dawn, your response is drafted.

Watch what Mockingbird does with the hours your team is asleep.

Investor Snapshot

Traceable outputs. Work you can review.
Not another black box.

Every output links to the underlying record. Attorneys direct the work and approve outputs for their clients. The result: faster case assessment, stronger strategy, and fewer surprises at deadline.

Validation Environment

Live Litigation Use

We run Mockingbird now in production — active, high-stakes litigation across multiple forums.

Time-To-Value

Hours, Not Weeks

Early case assessment that took weeks now finishes in hours. Every finding links to the record.

Security Model

Your Providers. Your Keys.

Mockingbird hosts your workspace and stores your documents. You choose your inference providers and supply your own API keys. Read the launch data-handling details.

Why Mockingbird

Litigation demands precision.
Your infrastructure should match.

A single matter can produce more documents than your team will ever read. Manual review augmented by keyword search retrieves documents but misses the relationships between them. Gaps surface at the worst moment — at deposition, at trial. Mockingbird maps contradictions and timelines across the full record. Every output links back to its source. The model compounds: every document sharpens it. Within weeks the platform holds the case better than any single attorney on your team. Attorneys set the strategy. The platform runs against it overnight and between hearings. The drafts are sourced, cited, and waiting when the team arrives.

How It Works

From raw discovery
to structured, citable analysis.

01
Ink-and-wash illustration of archived document boxes and pages strung on lines — ingestion and extraction

Extract & Verify

You hand Mockingbird a document production. It hands back structured, citable elements — facts, assertions, dates, entities, and relationships — each traced to its source page.

02
Ink-and-wash illustration of an investigation board linking witness photos and documents with string — case modeling and contradiction mapping

Analyze & Model

Mockingbird builds evidence models from verified elements. It maps where witnesses contradict each other and flags gaps in the documentary timeline before your team discovers them at deposition.

03
Ink-and-wash illustration of a case dashboard flagging an urgent docket item — source-attributed output

Synthesize Strategy

Your attorneys set the strategy. Mockingbird runs against it — not on command, but continuously. A contradiction surfaces between two witnesses at 2 a.m. By morning the sourced draft is in the review queue. No one requested it. No one knew it was needed. If a finding cannot show its work, it does not ship.

Services

What changes when your evidence
has structure.

Ink-and-wash triptych: a clear amber route through a city maze, drafts prepared overnight on a desk, and an evidence wall with one gap lit amber

Faster Case Assessment

One clear path through the maze — the route that matters, in minutes.

Case Preparation

The work is waiting when you arrive — assembled overnight, ready to review.

Fewer Blind Spots

The gap gets caught early — flagged before the other side sees it.

The Problem

Documents are the easy part.
Structure is the hard part.

Modern litigation produces more discoverable material than manual review can consistently analyze. Keyword search retrieves documents but misses the relationships between them — the contradictions, the timeline gaps, the patterns that win or lose a case.

Mockingbird lives in that gap.

Ink-and-wash scene of paper stacks resolving into a connected structure

Built For

Built for teams where the evidence
is too large to hold in your head.

AmLaw 100 Litigation Groups

Hundreds of thousands of documents. Dozens of witnesses. Your team needs structure before strategy, and keyword search does not give it to you.

Trial Teams

Trial is approaching. Your team has forty binders and institutional memory distributed across associates who have since moved on. Mockingbird holds the full picture and never transfers to another practice group.

eDiscovery Departments

You moved past keyword search. TAR handles relevance, but it does not give you analysis you can reuse across the life of a matter.

In-House Litigation Counsel

You manage outside counsel but rely on their read of the record. Mockingbird gives you independent analytical capability over the same evidence — and it never forgets a document when the partner assignment changes.

Your next matter has a deadline.
Start with structure, not search.

Request a Technical Overview

Questions

Frequently Asked
Questions.

  • Case, Practice and Firm run on Mockingbird’s hosted service, which stores your documents. Authorized staff can access customer data. You configure your own inference-provider relationships and API keys. Connected features send relevant material to those providers; their terms and your settings govern training and retention. Zero-knowledge encryption is coming soon and is unavailable at launch. See launch details.

  • Complex commercial litigation, class actions, regulatory investigations — any matter where the document count has quietly exceeded the team's ability to track it. Most teams know when they have crossed that line. Few have a plan for it.

  • No. No one has ever won a case by citing their software. Mockingbird produces structured analytical inputs — evidence models, source-attributed memoranda, contradiction maps. The infrastructure surfaces what the record contains. The team decides what it means.

  • No. Attorneys approve the strategy and priorities. Mockingbird runs against them continuously. When a contradiction surfaces or a new production shifts the timeline, the platform drafts the response and sources it to the record without a query. The team reviews what the platform found — not what the team remembered to ask about. Ask Scout anything about the record; it answers with sources.

  • Yes. You read that correctly. The platform reads the real-time transcript and maps it against the full case record — in the room, not after the fact. Courts are writing the rules on AI in proceedings. We welcome that. If a court asks what the platform did during a deposition, we can show them.

  • Every output links to specific source documents, page numbers, and extracted facts. Attorneys can audit any assertion back to its evidentiary basis. The chain is visible and editable — not buried in a log file.

  • Case, Practice and Firm include a hosted workspace and onboarding assistance. Bring your documents and supported API keys for AI features. For private cloud or on-premises Enterprise deployment, we agree on scope and timing before purchase.

  • Yes. Mockingbird imports standard discovery exports. Supported platforms and setup details are available during registration.

  • Case starts at $99/month, Practice at $249/month, and Firm at $999/month. Save 20% with annual billing. Enterprise pricing is custom. AI providers bill usage separately. Compare plans and request access.

Get in Touch

Tell us about your matter.
We respond in one business day.

Tell us about your matter and the plan you need. You can also apply for reduced-fee founding customer access. Subscriptions include neither legal representation nor attorney review. Review generated work, source references and deadlines before relying on them.

Page updated September 29, 2026